Peer-Review

1. All received the editorial office articles relevant topics of the journal, are subject to mandatory review for the purpose of expert evaluation.

2. Review of the articles carried by members of the editorial council and the editorial board, as well as invited experts. All reviewers are leading experts in the relevant branches of science and have publications on topic of peer-reviewed articles for the past three years.

3. Editorial staff establishes the term of reviewing (no more than 1 month) together with the reviewer.

4. The editorial office directs to the authors of submissions copies of reviews or reasoned refusal (by e-mail), as well as copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation when requested to the editor office.

5. If the review contains recommendations for corrective and revision articles, the editorial office directs the author text reviews with suggestions to consider them in preparing a new version of the article or arguments to refute them. Revision of the article should not take more than 2 months from the date of sending the e-mail to the author about the need to make changes. The article modified by the author re-directs for review.

6. If the authors do not return the modified version of the article at the end of 2 months, the editors remove it from the register.

7. Editorial staff may recommend the materials of polemical character which need more detailed discussion to review at an extended meeting of the editorial board together with the author and the competent experts.

8. Reviews are stored in the editorial office of the periodical during 5 years.